|
Post by Sanji Watsuki on Nov 12, 2006 22:29:03 GMT -5
I've been thinking and doing a little research and here is how I'm going to handle it.
Reliever to Starter Pros: More endurance Can fill that spot in the rotation
Cons: Lower K/9 To even things out, lower overall statistics Unless you have a proven starter you're look at 70-75 endurance Unless you have a proven starter you're looking at a non-seamless transition
Starter to Reliever Pros: Higher K/9 Better control & movement
Cons: Less endurance Higher chance of a seamless transition, but still the possibility of complications Doing this merely to raise overall will sap you of your priviledge of pitching conversions
Comments?
|
|
|
Post by Sanji Watsuki on Dec 3, 2006 12:12:58 GMT -5
More on the relief pitcher --> starting.
Endurance-wise it is based on former past pitching experience in the last decade, and only if it was a full season. 6.05 IP/G=71 endurance, 6.1 IP/G=72 endurance, 6.15 IP/G=73 endurance, and so forth to a maximum of 85.
Overalls going from a closer to starter are going to be capped at 95. Otherwise there will be no change in overall.
K rates will be capped at 95 power.
|
|