|
|
Post by mwarnerchi on Nov 17, 2006 15:52:37 GMT -5
Cards give:
David Eckstien
Mark McCormick
Mariners Give:
Yuniensky Betancourt
Joel Pineiro
|
|
|
|
Post by giantsrule1234 on Nov 17, 2006 15:53:26 GMT -5
accept
|
|
|
|
Post by HalosGM on Nov 17, 2006 16:28:38 GMT -5
I think im gonna have to Veto this. Mariners are giving up 2 average players only in the 70's for two with peaks of 85. How does everyone else feel about this one?
VETO
|
|
|
|
Post by mwarnerchi on Nov 17, 2006 16:36:23 GMT -5
I think im gonna have to Veto this. Mariners are giving up 2 average players only in the 70's for two with peaks of 85. How does everyone else feel about this one?
VETO betancourt for me has a higher peak then that. piniero is a 78. thats solid i'd say. and mccormick only had a peak of 81 when i loked him up for the trade. he's also only like... a 65 rated player right now. if he doesn't develop he's just another arm that'll stay in the minors for the next 4 years. there are worse trades than this one. if both gms agree i dont see the big deal. |
|
|
|
Post by Sanji Watsuki on Nov 17, 2006 19:11:24 GMT -5
This is an objected trade. All of those who feel it is fair/unfair please state your reasons. This trade will be reevaluated on November 20th, whereas all of the mods and admins will take what is said in this topic and make a final decision.
That is all.
|
|
|
|
Post by thesoxrock34 on Nov 17, 2006 22:30:28 GMT -5
Its unfair. Just look at the talent.
|
|
|
|
Post by giantsrule1234 on Nov 17, 2006 23:14:27 GMT -5
yea i kinda think he got the better end of the deal i shouldent of done it
|
|
|
|
Post by yankeedude on Nov 17, 2006 23:17:23 GMT -5
Yeah, unfair. Betancourt shouldn't be considered with Eckstein having not played a full season
|
|
KC Royals
Graduating Newbie
[M:300000]
Posts: 110
|
Post by KC Royals on Nov 17, 2006 23:18:39 GMT -5
I'm with the veto group.
|
|
|
|
Post by mwarnerchi on Nov 17, 2006 23:45:39 GMT -5
alright fine, i guess its unanimous. cardinals GM if you wanna re-structure it let me know.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheJay on Nov 18, 2006 0:07:27 GMT -5
I wouldn't say it's unanimous. I don't think it's that bad a trade, but then my game also doesn't show Betancourt as a 70s player for some reason.
|
|
