|
|
Post by Sanji Watsuki on Nov 4, 2006 20:16:55 GMT -5
That is the question...
Should we do a season with the injuries or without?
Yes would mean go with injuries
No would mean clear them
|
|
|
|
Post by TheJay on Nov 4, 2006 21:12:56 GMT -5
Does this mean clearing the injuries of players who are injured to start the season in the rosters like Jeff Bagwell or Brandon Backe or does it mean turning injuries off completely? Also, kind of off-topic, but look at Jeremy Bonderman and Brett Myers. Doesn't affect my team, but don't they seem to be rated too low  |
|
|
|
Post by Sanji Watsuki on Nov 4, 2006 22:17:54 GMT -5
It means clearing injuries. Myers and Bonderman will be restored to their previous level, thank you for bringing this up. It is a Mogul bug.
|
|
sublime
Graduating Newbie
[M:300000]
Posts: 150
|
Post by sublime on Nov 5, 2006 16:12:37 GMT -5
clear the injuries
|
|
|
|
Post by rockies770 on Nov 29, 2006 22:43:12 GMT -5
keep injuries
|
|
|
|
Post by TheJay on Nov 29, 2006 22:46:43 GMT -5
This was to reflect injuries to players who were out for a significant time at the beginning of the year in the original rosters. Now that simming's started this poll doesn't really matter. In-game injuries still take place.
|
|
|
|
Post by satorini on Nov 30, 2006 0:40:49 GMT -5
good.. because to have no injuries would be stupid.. ever owner would put their teams on 3 man rotations and dominate because there would be no fatigue caused injuries... it would be so silly
|
|
|
|
Post by TheJay on Nov 30, 2006 0:47:01 GMT -5
Yeah, that would be really dumb. I think I'm going to go ahead and lock this thread since it's irrelevant after the fact that all existing injuries in the original rosters were removed.
|
|
